What do you do when every management tactic fails and your team still isn't performing? Most leaders resort to threats, but there's a more effective way to spark a fire in people who've lost their drive. Challenging employees means appealing to their natural desire to excel by turning work into a game or a competition.
According to research cited by Dale Carnegie, about 15 percent of financial success is due to technical knowledge, while 85 percent is due to human engineering and the ability to lead people. This isn't just a theory; it's the bedrock of high-performance management. If you can't inspire your team to care about the score, no amount of technical expertise will save your bottom line.
This concept comes from Dale Carnegie’s timeless business classic, How to Win Friends and Influence People. He tells the story of Charles Schwab, who was once faced with a mill manager whose men weren't meeting their production quotas despite constant coaxing and threats. Schwab didn't give a speech or fire the manager; instead, he asked how many "heats" the day shift had made and chalked a large "6" on the floor.
When the night shift arrived, they saw the number and asked what it meant. After learning it was the day shift's score, they worked with a vengeance and replaced it with a "7" the next morning. Schwab understood that high-spirited people respond to the opportunity for self-expression and the chance to prove their worth.
Many managers think pay and benefits are the only things that matter to workers. However, behavioral scientist Frederic Herzberg found that the most motivating factor for any worker is the work itself. When you turn a task into a challenge, you're giving the employee a chance to excel and win.
People of spirit don't just want a paycheck; they want to feel that their efforts lead to a victory. By setting a benchmark, you're creating a game that everyone wants to play. It transforms a boring, repetitive task into an opportunity to demonstrate superior skill.
Successful leaders don't just issue orders; they create environments where the score matters. This isn't about creating a cutthroat or toxic atmosphere. It's about tapping into the "desire to be important" that exists in every human being.
When you give someone a target to hit, you're showing respect for their ability. You're saying, "I believe you're big enough and capable enough to handle this." This subtle shift in perception can move mountains where a direct order would only cause friction.
There are times when even the best communicators face resistance. In these moments, throwing down a challenge becomes the final option for a leader. It's the tactic you use when you've tried being friendly, you've tried being firm, and nothing has moved the needle.
As the King’s Guard in ancient Greece believed, the brave put down their fears and go forward to victory. When you challenge someone, you're forcing them to decide whether they're a person of spirit or just someone punching a clock. Most people will choose to be the person of spirit every single time.
Charles Schwab’s mill eventually became the most productive in the company because the day and night shifts began a relentless but healthy competition. It wasn't about the money; it was about the game itself. Schwab was famously paid over $1 million a year—a staggering $3,000 per day in 1921—largely because of this ability to arouse enthusiasm among his people.
Another example comes from Al Smith, the former Governor of New York. He needed a warden for Sing Sing prison, which was then a place of scandals and danger. Smith told a potential candidate, "Young fellow, I don't blame you for being scared. It's a tough spot. It'll take a big person to go up there and stay."
Lewis E. Lawes took the job because he couldn't resist the challenge of being that "big person." He stayed for decades and became the most famous warden of his time. He didn't do it for the political appointment; he did it because Smith had challenged his character.
Establish a clear, public benchmark. Pick a single metric that represents success for the task and make it visible to everyone involved. This could be a number on a whiteboard, a chart in the breakroom, or a simple figure chalked on the floor as Schwab did.
Frame the task as a test of character. Instead of telling someone they have to do a job, ask them if they think they're capable of hitting a specific, difficult target. Use phrasing like, "I know this is a tough spot, and it'll take someone with real grit to handle it."
Step back and let the game play out. Once the challenge is set, don't micromanage the process. Let the employees' natural desire to win take over, and give them the autonomy to find their own way to the finish line.
Critics of this method argue that it can lead to burnout or a toxic workplace if overused. If every day is a high-stakes competition, the "game" eventually loses its luster and becomes a source of stress rather than motivation. This is a fair point, as the human spirit needs periods of rest between bouts of intense effort.
Some experts also suggest that competition can stifle collaboration. If the day shift is hiding tools from the night shift just to win, the company as a whole suffers. Leaders must ensure the challenge is focused on excellence and shared goals rather than purely defeating a colleague.
Effective leaders know that challenging employees is a tool for growth, not a weapon for control. People want to feel important and capable of overcoming obstacles. When you provide the obstacle, you're actually providing the path to their own professional satisfaction. Select one underperforming metric this week and post the current score in a public area for your team to see.
To avoid burnout, ensure the challenge is framed as a healthy game rather than a life-or-death struggle. Keep the duration of the competition limited and provide ample recognition once the goal is reached. The goal is to stimulate a desire to excel, not to create a permanent state of high-stress performance.
When teams are uninspired, common motivation techniques like bonuses often fall flat. Instead, try appealing to their pride by setting a benchmark and challenging them to beat it. Turning the work into a playable game with visible scores can re-engage the human spirit in a way that financial incentives cannot.
Direct orders often trigger a defensive response or a feeling of being 'managed.' Stimulating competition, however, empowers the employee to prove their own worth. It shifts the focus from 'doing what I'm told' to 'winning the game,' which is a far more powerful internal driver for most people.
In high-pressure environments, leaders should use challenges to build confidence rather than increase anxiety. Frame the situation as an opportunity for the team to show what they are made of. By focusing on the 'game' and the desire to excel, you can help the team channel their stress into productive action.
The Final Option When Nothing Else Works, Throw Down a Challenge
Stop the Blame Game 6 Toxic Workplace Behaviors That Kill Team Culture
Why Bother with Greatness? The Case for Meaningful Work
When Competition is the Problem, Not the Solution
The Reason Bright Students Choose Indefinite Finance (And Why It’s a Problem)
The 'Father Forgets' Principle Why Compassionate Leadership Wins in the Workplace
The Magic Mix Preserving Your Core While Stimulating Progress
The Hard Finish How to Set Boundaries Between Work and Home
Stop Filling Boxes Strategy vs. Tactical Planning
The Alchemy of Greatness Combining Discipline with Entrepreneurship