If your marketing team has no idea what your product engineers are currently building, you aren't running a business; you're managing a disaster in slow motion. This dynamic, known as information siloing, occurs when a company intentionally or unintentionally isolates departments, preventing them from sharing critical data and context. In the most extreme cases, these walls are built on purpose to hide defects and prevent employees from connecting the dots of a failing strategy. Without a unified view of operations, minor errors quickly evolve into catastrophic defects that can destroy a brand's reputation and lead to massive regulatory fines.

What is Information Siloing?

In his investigative book Bad Blood, John Carreyrou details how Elizabeth Holmes and Sunny Balwani used information siloing as a primary management tool at Theranos. The concept refers to the practice of restricting the flow of information between different groups within an organization. At its core, it ensures that no single individual—except for those at the very top—has a complete picture of the company's progress or its failures.

While traditional businesses often suffer from silos due to poor software or geographic distance, the siloing at Theranos was a deliberate structural choice. It wasn't just about inefficiency; it was about control. By preventing the chemistry team from talking to the engineering team, leadership ensured that the chemists didn't realize the engineers couldn't build the machines they needed, and the engineers didn't realize the chemistry wasn't actually working. According to McKinsey research, employees spend an average of 9.3 hours per week simply searching and gathering information, a figure that skyrockets when silos are enforced by management.

Solving Technical Issues Through Team Transparency

When a company prioritizes team transparency, it allows specialists from different fields to collaborate on complex problems that a single department cannot solve alone. In a healthy environment, an engineer would sit with a chemist to understand why a specific fluidic valve is leaking or why a light signal is too weak.

At Theranos, this was strictly forbidden. Employees were discouraged from talking to colleagues in other departments, and the physical layout of the office was designed to reinforce these barriers. This lack of visibility meant that engineers continued to iterate on designs that were fundamentally incompatible with the underlying science, leading to years of wasted time and millions in burned capital.

How Information Siloing Conceals Fatal Product Flaws

The most dangerous aspect of information siloing is that it allows a company to ship defective products under the guise of progress. If the quality control team is separated from the production line, they cannot provide the immediate feedback necessary to halt a bad batch.

In the Bad Blood narrative, this manifested in the "Jurassic Park" and "Normandy" lab split. The commercial lab (Jurassic Park) was kept separate from the proprietary research lab (Normandy), which meant that the technicians processing actual patient samples didn't have access to the data showing the proprietary machines were failing quality-control checks. This separation created a reality where the company could ignore its own internal failures because the people responsible for reporting results weren't the ones seeing the errors.

The Real Cost of Fragmented Internal Communications

Effective internal communications function as the central nervous system of a business. When those channels are severed, the organization loses its ability to react to external threats or internal crises. At Theranos, the IT department was even tasked with monitoring communication to ensure no unauthorized sharing occurred.

Chat ports were blocked, and digital silos were enforced through strict folder permissions that prevented cross-departmental reviews. This environment of fear and secrecy meant that even when employees like Tyler Shultz or Erika Cheung noticed discrepancies in test accuracy, they had no formal, open channel to report their findings without fear of retribution. This lack of communication isn't just a productivity drag; it is a cultural poison that drives away top talent and invites regulatory scrutiny.

Combatting Information Siloing in High-Stakes Environments

To prevent the systemic failures seen in the Theranos saga, leaders must move toward a model of radical visibility. This doesn't mean sharing every trade secret with every intern, but it does mean ensuring that the people responsible for the final product have the data required to verify its safety.

When a company allows knowledge management to be weaponized as a tool of exclusion, it loses the ability to perform honest self-correction. In the case of Safeway, poor information sharing led the company to spend $350 million on renovations for wellness centers that were never used because the underlying technology wasn't ready. Honest communication between the partner's medical team and the startup's lab could have saved the grocery giant years of wasted investment and a massive blow to its stock price.

Three Ways to Dismantle Digital Walls

  1. Establish Cross-Departmental Review Boards. Schedule a mandatory bi-weekly meeting where lead engineers, scientists, and marketing staff must present their current progress and obstacles to each other. This ensures that every department understands the technical limitations of the others and prevents the marketing team from making promises the product cannot keep.

  2. Consolidate Data into a Shared Knowledge Hub. Use a centralized project management system where documentation is accessible to all relevant teams by default. If a chemist finds a flaw in an assay, that data should be visible to the engineer designing the cartridge immediately, without requiring a high-level executive to act as a gatekeeper.

  3. Implement a Flat Reporting Structure for Quality Concerns. Create an anonymous and protected channel where any employee can report a product defect or ethical concern directly to a compliance officer or board member. This bypasses the middle-management silos that often filter out bad news to protect their own standing with the CEO.

When Intellectual Property Becomes a Barrier

Critics of total transparency often argue that information siloing is necessary to protect intellectual property and prevent corporate espionage. This is particularly true in the biotech and tech sectors, where a single leaked patent could cost a firm its entire competitive advantage. Some observers point out that compartmentalization is a standard practice at organizations like Apple or NASA to maintain security on high-stakes projects. While security is vital, these critics get it right when they say the problem isn't the existence of silos, but the lack of a mechanism to bridge them for quality control. The Theranos failure showed that using security as an excuse to block internal peer review eventually leads to a product that fails the most basic safety standards.

To build a resilient organization, you must move toward a model of radical visibility across all technical and operational functions to prevent the growth of information siloing. Audit your internal communication permissions this afternoon to ensure every team member has the context they need to succeed.

Questions

What is the primary danger of information siloing in a startup?

The primary danger is that it prevents the organization from performing honest self-correction. In a siloed environment, the engineering team may work for months on a design that the science team knows is impossible. This leads to massive capital waste, missed deadlines, and a culture where defects are hidden rather than fixed, eventually resulting in a product that fails in the real world.

How does information siloing affect employee retention?

Siloing creates a toxic work environment built on suspicion and fear. High-performing employees generally value transparency and collaboration. When they feel like they are being kept in the dark or are discouraged from talking to colleagues in other departments, they lose trust in leadership. This leads to high turnover rates, as seen in the Theranos story, where dozens of top scientists and engineers resigned or were fired for asking too many questions.

Can information siloing ever be beneficial for a business?

Siloing is often defended as a necessary tool for protecting trade secrets and intellectual property. By restricting who has access to specific codes or chemical formulas, a company reduces the risk of a leak to competitors. However, the benefits of security must be balanced against the need for internal quality control. If the silo prevents your own quality assurance team from seeing defects, the security is actually a liability that can lead to corporate collapse.

What are the signs that my company has an information siloing problem?

Common signs include frequent 'surprises' during project launches, departments blaming each other for failures, and a lack of shared goals. If your employees spend a significant amount of time searching for basic information that should be easily accessible, or if they feel they need 'permission' to speak with someone in a different department, you likely have deep structural silos that are hampering your productivity.